雅思写作任务二要求考生在40分钟内完成一篇250字以上的议论文,其中讨论观点类题目（Discuss both views and give your own opinion）是最常见的题型之一，这类题目要求考生客观分析双方立场，并清晰表达个人观点，想要在雅思写作中取得高分，需要掌握以下核心技巧。

审题精准，明确讨论方向

许多考生失分的原因在于未完全理解题目要求,讨论观点类题目通常给出两种对立观点，

Some people believe that governments should fund arts programs, while others argue that this money should be spent on public services. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

关键步骤：

• 划出关键词：明确讨论对象（如“arts programs”和“public services”）和核心矛盾（“funding allocation”）。
• 避免偏题：确保文章均衡讨论双方观点，而非仅支持一方。

结构清晰，逻辑连贯

雅思写作评分标准中,“Coherence and Cohesion”（连贯与衔接）占25%，推荐采用四段式结构：

引言段（Introduction）

• 背景句：简要引入话题（如“Public funding allocation is a contentious issue.”）。 用不同句式复述题目要求（如“While some advocate for arts funding, others prioritize essential services.”）。
• 明确立场：直接表明是否支持某一方或提出折中观点（如“This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is optimal.”）。

主体段1（View 1）

• 主题句：清晰陈述第一种观点（如“Supporters of arts funding argue that cultural projects enrich society.”）。
• 论据支撑：用具体例子或数据（如“The Sydney Opera House generates significant tourism revenue.”）。
• 分析延伸：解释该观点的合理性（如“Long-term cultural investments can foster national identity.”）。

主体段2（View 2）

• 主题句：过渡到对立观点（如“Conversely, opponents contend that public services demand urgent funding.”）。
• 论据支撑：举例说明（如“Hospitals and schools in rural areas often lack resources.”）。
• 分析延伸：强调现实需求（如“Basic services directly impact citizens’ quality of life.”）。

结尾段（Conclusion）

• 总结双方观点：用1-2句话概括核心分歧。
• 重申个人立场：避免简单重复，可提出新角度（如“While arts funding has merit, governments must first address inequality through public service investments.”）。

语言精准，体现学术性

词汇多样性

避免重复使用简单词汇。

• Important → Crucial, vital, pivotal
• Think → Argue, contend, assert

句式灵活度

混合使用复杂句和简单句：

• 条件句：“If governments neglect public services, social inequality may worsen.”
• 被动语态：“Arts programs are often regarded as non-essential.”
• 比较句：“While arts funding fosters creativity, public services save lives.”

衔接词运用

• 对比：However, On the contrary, Conversely
• 补充：Furthermore, Moreover, In addition
• 因果：Consequently, As a result, Therefore

论证深度与批判性思维

高分作文需展示分析能力,而非罗列观点。

• 假设反驳：“Critics of arts funding may claim it benefits only urban elites, yet community theaters in rural areas disprove this.”
• 数据引用：“A 2020 UNESCO report showed that arts education reduces youth crime rates by 15%.”

时间管理与检查

• 规划时间：建议5分钟构思，30分钟写作，5分钟检查。
• 常见错误排查：
  • 主谓一致（如“The government argue” → “argues”）
  • 冠词误用（如“invest in education” → “invest in the education system”）
  • 拼写易错词（如“definitely”而非“definately”）

高分范文分析

以下是一个7分以上范文片段：

Introduction:
The debate over whether public funds should support arts or essential services reflects broader societal priorities. While cultural projects enhance national prestige, healthcare and education are undeniably more pressing. This essay will analyze both arguments before advocating for a needs-based allocation system.

Body Paragraph 1:
Proponents of arts funding emphasize its intangible benefits. For instance, the UK’s investment in the Tate Modern has solidified London’s status as a global cultural hub, attracting millions of tourists annually. Such projects also preserve heritage, as seen in Japan’s meticulous restoration of historic temples. Without state support, many artistic endeavors would struggle to survive.

Body Paragraph 2:
Nevertheless, public services remain a lifeline for marginalized communities. In developing nations like India, overcrowded hospitals frequently lack basic medicines, leading to preventable deaths. Similarly, underfunded schools perpetuate cycles of poverty. When budgets are limited, prioritizing these areas aligns with utilitarian principles of maximizing societal welfare.

备考建议

• 每日练习：限时写作并对照评分标准修改。
• 素材积累：关注BBC、The Guardian等媒体的社论板块，学习论证逻辑。
• 反馈获取：通过专业批改服务识别薄弱环节。

雅思讨论观点写作的核心在于平衡、逻辑与深度，通过系统训练和策略应用，考生完全可以在短期内显著提升成绩，写作不仅是语言测试，更是思维能力的体现——清晰的结构、有力的论据和精准的表达，三者缺一不可。