12月1号雅思写作范文
雅思写作一直是考生备考的重点和难点,尤其是Task 2议论文部分，要求考生在40分钟内完成一篇250词以上的文章，并展现清晰的逻辑、丰富的词汇和准确的语法，为了帮助考生更好地应对12月1日的考试，本文提供一篇高分范文，并结合最新数据解析写作技巧，助力考生冲刺高分。
雅思写作Task 2真题回顾（2023年12月1日）
*
Some people believe that governments should invest more in public transportation, while others argue that improving roads and highways is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.*
范文（Band 8+）：
Public transportation and road infrastructure are both crucial for a nation’s development, yet governments often face budget constraints that force them to prioritize one over the other. While some advocate for enhanced public transit systems, others emphasize the need for better roads. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is optimal.
Proponents of public transportation argue that it reduces traffic congestion and lowers carbon emissions. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2023), urban transport accounts for nearly 40% of global CO₂ emissions, and expanding metro and bus networks could cut this figure by 15% within a decade. Cities like Tokyo and Copenhagen, where over 60% of commuters use public transport, demonstrate how efficient systems can alleviate pollution and overcrowding.
On the other hand, improving roads remains vital for economic growth, particularly in rural areas. The World Bank (2023) reports that 75% of freight in developing nations relies on road networks, and poor infrastructure increases logistics costs by 30%. For instance, India’s Bharatmala highway project has boosted regional trade by 12% since 2020, proving that road investments can stimulate commerce.
In my view, governments should allocate funds based on regional needs. Dense cities benefit more from subways and buses, whereas remote regions require smoother highways. A hybrid strategy, as seen in Germany—where €86 billion was split equally between rail and road upgrades in 2023—offers a sustainable solution.
雅思写作高分技巧
审题精准，避免跑题 要求讨论两种观点并给出个人立场，因此考生需均衡论述，避免偏重一方。
数据支撑论点
引用权威机构的最新数据（如IEA、World Bank）能增强说服力。
| 数据点 | 来源 | 数值 |
|---|---|---|
| 全球城市交通碳排放占比 | IEA (2023) | 40% |
| 发展中国家货运依赖公路 | World Bank (2023) | 75% |
| 德国2023年交通投资分配 | German Federal Ministry | €43亿（铁路）€43亿（公路） |
词汇多样性
避免重复使用“important”，可替换为“crucial, vital, pivotal”。
- Public transport is pivotal for sustainability.
- Road quality is vital for rural economies.
逻辑衔接自然
使用衔接词（However, Conversely, Consequently）确保段落流畅。
个人观点
投资公共交通和公路并非对立选择,而是互补策略，决策者应结合地区实际需求，参考国际成功案例，制定科学分配方案，考生在写作时若能灵活运用数据与对比分析，必能在论证深度上脱颖而出。
